Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Sustainability indicators


As this wasn’t part of the lesson, I thought it might be interesting for others as well. I wondered how the progress of sustainable development is measured and visualized. Because of this I searched for some actual systems.
The “Committee of Sustainable Development“ (CSD) introduced a set of basic indicators in 1997. Since then, 22 countries (e.g. Germany) are testing these indicators. As the basic indicator set doesn’t fit the need of all participating countries, each participant defined their own set of indicators. Because of that, a comparison of the different countries is extremely difficult. I will use the report of the Federal Statistical Office of Germany as a base for this blog entry.
The report is divided into four parts. As there are more than 30 indicators, I will mention only the most interesting The first part handles the Intergenerational equity, which includes resource conservation, climate protection, the usage of renewable energy sources and other environmental issues. The quality of life is part of the second part, this includes mobility, air quality, crime rate and healthcare. The third part is about Social cohesion, examples for that are the employment rate, integration and equal opportunities. The last part deals with the international responsibility and includes only two indicators: Development cooperation and Opening markets.
The report is published every two years. In every report, the collected data is compared to the previous reports. These trends are compared to the climate & sustainability goals of the government. In the report of 2012, which is available online (see link), more than the half of the indicator developed in a positive way. 20 indicators are developing weaker than expected, the defined goals might not be achieved. The remaining 8 indicators had a very high deviation of the target value.
This example shows the effort of some countries in setting transparent goals for sustainability. On the other hand these goals are relatively weak, as the government tries to set achievable goals. There are several other criticisms as well, but as these indicator systems are “new”, they might need some time to develop.



No comments:

Post a Comment